Abdool Salim Yasseen and Thomas v Attorney-General
| Jurisdiction | Guyana |
| Judgment Date | 1996 |
| Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Guyana) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
The Attorney General et Al v Joseph and Boyce
...be immune from curial challenge.” 34 Closer to home, Fitzpatrick, J.A., in Yassin v. Attorney-General of Guyana [1993] 4 L.R.C. 1; (1996) 62 W.I.R. 98, with respect to the prerogative of mercy, held at page 117A that: “In this case justiciability concerning the exercise of the prerogative ......
-
The Attorney General et Al v Joseph and Boyce
...12 (1996) AC 527; (1996) 47 WIR 9 13 (1979)32 WIR 347; [1979] 1 WLR 1342 14 [1996] AC 397; (1995) 47 WIR 439 15 [1993] 4 LRC 1 (1996) 62 WIR 98 16 [1994] QB 349 17 (1995) 47 WIR 74 18 [2002] 2 AC 235; (2002) 60 WIR 42 19 [1969] 2 AC 147 20 (1981) 32 WIR 375 at 393–394; [1982] ......
-
Yong Vui Kong v Attorney-General
...and Boyce (at [62]–[64]); and (c) the decision of the Court of Appeal of Guyana in Abdool Salim Yasseen and Thomas v Attorney-General ((1996) 62 WIR 98, where George JA referred (at 113–114) to the extract from Ong Ah Chuan. In contrast, the Respondent’s case on the Natural Justice Issue in......
-
The Attorney General et Al v Joseph and Boyce
...of the respondents to the protection of the law. As was stated by Fitzpatrick, J.A. in Yassin & Thomas v. Attorney General of Guyana (1996) 62 W.I.R. 98 “justiciability concerning the exercise of the prerogative of mercy applies not to the decision itself but to the manner in which it is re......