Gordon Sandiford v DPP
| Jurisdiction | Guyana |
| Date | 1979 |
| Year | 1979 |
| Court | High Court (Guyana) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Mervin Cameron v Attorney General of Jamaica
...Wildman relied on two cases from the Cooperative Republic of Guyana. These were Garden Sandiford v The Director of Public Prosecutions (1979) 28 WIR 152 and Attorney General of Guyana v Persaud (2010) 78 WIR 335. In Sandiford, the facts were that the applicant had been in custody since July......
-
Fidel O'Flaherty Appellant v Attorney General DPP The Chief of Police of Saint Christopher and Nevis Respondents [ECSC]
...of cases text and determined before 1985, includingR v DERBY CROWN COURT ex parte BROOKS 1984 Cr. App. R 164, SANDIFORD v D.P.P. (1979) 28 W.I.R. 152 R v WEST LONDON STIPENDIARY MAGISTRATE ex parte ANDERSON 1984 Cr. App. R 143; and he referred to several aspects of the instant appeal, invit......
-
Patrick Bailey Plaintiff v Attorney General of St. Vincent and the Grenadines DPP Defendants [ECSC]
...of the charge after the lapse of a reasonable time as an abuse of the process. 48 Sandiford v The Director of Public Prosecutions 1979 28 WIR p 152 provided yet another opportunity for the courts to advise on the importance of proceeding to trial within a reasonable time. In that case the ......
-
Sharman Rosemond Claimant v (1) Police Constable Charles # 190 (2) Attorney General of Saint lucia (Sued Herein by Crown Proceedings Ordinance Chapter 13 of the Revised Laws of Saint Lucia) (3) DPP (4) His Worship The Honourable Mister Horace Fraser (5) Commissioner of Police (6) Superintendent of Prisons Defendants [ECSC]
...that there has been no unreasonable delay in the circumstances: (1.—Attorney General v Jobe [1984] 3 WLR 174; 2.—Sandiford v D.P.P. [1979] 28 W.I.R. 152; 3.—Bell v D.P.P. and Another [1986] L.R.C. (Const) 392; 4.—Flowers v D.P.P. [2000] 1 W.L.R. 2396). 49 In the 3rd and 4th cases, the Priv......
Request a trial to view additional results