Joseph Daniel James v Carl Crawford
| Jurisdiction | Guyana |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Guyana) |
| Year | 1969 |
| Date | 1969 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Junor v Ferouz
...‘good and substantial reasons’ as is provided for in order 2 Rules 3(4) and (5) of the Court of Appeal Rules. In James v. Crawford (1969) 14 W. I. R. p. 338, Crane J.A. (as he then was) in delivering the judgment of the Court of Appeal traced the history of sec. 14 of the Summary Jurisdicti......
-
Sheryard Deane Appellant v Cynthia Allamby Respondent
.../s/ J. Wit The Hon Mr Justice J Wit /s/ D. Hayton The Hon Mr Justice D Hayton /s/ M. Rajnauth-Lee The Hon Mme Justice M Rajnauth-Lee 1 (1969) 14 WIR 338. 2 [2010] UKPC 26 at paragraph 3 [1891] A.C. 210 at 214. 4 [2010] UKPC 26 at [19] 5 (1963) WIR 453. 6 See: Barker v Palmer (1881) 8 QB; Du......
-
Deane v Allamby
...leave was refused, there was never any appeal before the Court of Appeal. He relied on the dicta of Crane J in James v. Crawford [ (1969) 14 WIR 338.] in which a distinction was made between the status of an intended appellant and an appellant and submitted that in this case there was neve......