Kadar Lall Gobind v H S Cameron, et Al
| Jurisdiction | Guyana |
| Year | 1970 |
| Date | 1970 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Guyana) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Charles v Skeete
...(1971) omitted in 17 W.I.R., but see cyclostyled report of the judgment of Crane, J.A., at p. 17, and Gobind v. Cameron et al, (1970) 17 W.I.R. 132, at p. 154; also, Seepersaud v. Port Mourant Ltd., (1972) 19 W.I.R. 393. 24 This being so, it seems clear that by the repeal of the Defense R......
-
Toolsie Persaud Ltd v Andrew James Investments Ltd et Al
...as made clear by Wooding, C.J. in Richardson v. Lawrence (1966) 10 W.I.R. 234 at 237–238 and Crane, J.A. in Gobind v. Cameron (1970) 17 W.I.R. 132 at 154. 27 We endorse the following remarks of Lord Browne-Wilkinson in the leading case, J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. Graham [2003] 1 A.C. 419 at [......
-
Bisnauth v Shewprashad and Bisnauth
...entry was not referable to an agreement or permission of the true owner. Over thirty years earlier Crane, J.A. in Gobind v. Cameron (1970) 17 W.I.R. 132 emphatically stated that “the modern notion of adverse possession is to be found in s. 10(1) of Cap. 184(G) where it can be seen that the ......
-
Sandra Briggs and Sandra Briggs (as Legal Personal Representative of the estate of Lenore Briggs, deceased) v John Briggs
...the true owners fell short of possession and was insufficient to prevent the squatter from being in exclusive possession. In Kadar Lail Gobind v. H S Cameron et al (1970) 17 W.I.R. 132 at 154 (Guyana) Crane, J.A. said that “the difference between making an entry and entering into possessio......
Request a trial to view additional results