Kadar Lall Gobind v H S Cameron, et Al
| Jurisdiction | Guyana |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Guyana) |
| Year | 1970 |
| Date | 1970 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
-
Charles v Skeete
...(1971) omitted in 17 W.I.R., but see cyclostyled report of the judgment of Crane, J.A., at p. 17, and Gobind v. Cameron et al, (1970) 17 W.I.R. 132, at p. 154; also, Seepersaud v. Port Mourant Ltd., (1972) 19 W.I.R. 393. 24 This being so, it seems clear that by the repeal of the Defense R......
-
Toolsie Persaud Ltd v Andrew James Investments Ltd et Al
...as made clear by Wooding, C.J. in Richardson v. Lawrence (1966) 10 W.I.R. 234 at 237–238 and Crane, J.A. in Gobind v. Cameron (1970) 17 W.I.R. 132 at 154. 27 We endorse the following remarks of Lord Browne-Wilkinson in the leading case, J.A. Pye (Oxford) Ltd v. Graham [2003] 1 A.C. 419 at [......
-
Bisnauth v Shewprashad and Bisnauth
...entry was not referable to an agreement or permission of the true owner. Over thirty years earlier Crane, J.A. in Gobind v. Cameron (1970) 17 W.I.R. 132 emphatically stated that “the modern notion of adverse possession is to be found in s. 10(1) of Cap. 184(G) where it can be seen that the ......
-
Sandra Briggs and Sandra Briggs (as Legal Personal Representative of the estate of Lenore Briggs, deceased) v John Briggs
...the true owners fell short of possession and was insufficient to prevent the squatter from being in exclusive possession. In Kadar Lail Gobind v. H S Cameron et al (1970) 17 W.I.R. 132 at 154 (Guyana) Crane, J.A. said that “the difference between making an entry and entering into possessio......
Get Started for Free