R v Abdool Samad Abdul Salim and Roy Ralph
| Jurisdiction | Guyana |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Guyana) |
| Year | 1970 |
| Date | 1970 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
26 cases
-
R v Singh et Al
...were dissociating themselves completely from the inopinate employment of violence, as two of the accused did in R. v. Samad & Others, (1970) 15 W.I.R. 35. I arrive at this conclusion by reasoning analogically from what I would call the principle of withdrawal enunciated in cases like R. v.......
- The State v France
-
Bholanauth v The State
...to do so may result in a miscarriage of justice. [See Dihal v. The Queen (1960) L.R.B.G. 195 at p. 196, R. v. Samad, Salim and Ralph (1970) 15 W.I.R. 35, at p. 37.] 8 I would, however, allow the appeal for entirely different reasons. I would state them shortly. They involve a restatement an......
-
Walker v The Queen
...what the appellant must have done and whether it was done with intent to cause death. But, as Luckhoo, C.J. put it in R v. Samad [1970] 15 W.I.R. 35, the jury were left without proper guidance to roam in difficult area of fact. A failure to direct the jury on possibilities which they may fa......
Get Started for Free
