Re Application by Lennox Arthur and Calvin Hermanstyne
Jurisdiction | Guyana |
Judgment Date | 1972 |
Date | 1972 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Guyana) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
- An Application by Norris Williams and Cecil Salisbury; an Application under Articles 2, 10, 19, 47 and 73 of the Constitution of Guyana
-
Bata Shoe Company Guyana Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue; Attorney General Guyana Unit Trust Management Company Ltd et Al v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General
...for argument. (For the meaning of “to institute proceedings,” see Singh v. D'Oliveira, (1964) L.R.B.G. 163; Re Arthur & Hermanstyne, (1972) 19 W.I.R. 20, 55; and the two views of opposing counsel in Re Vernazza, [1960] 1 All E.R. 183, at p. 187.) 33 In my opinion, no right to a fair heari......
- Carlton Wilbert Weithers v Zena Weithers
-
Singh v Lall
...Guiana immediately before the 26th May, 1966.” [See Subsidiary Legislation for the year 1966, p. 244.] 66 In Re Arthur & Hermanstyne, (1972) 19 W.I.R. 20, at pp. 59–60, I endeavoured to show how the ancient prerogative writ of certiorari which has for centuries issued from the Queen's Benc......
Request a trial to view additional results