Re Application by Lennox Arthur and Calvin Hermanstyne
| Jurisdiction | Guyana |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Guyana) |
| Judgment Date | 1972 |
| Year | 1972 |
| Date | 1972 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 cases
- An Application by Norris Williams and Cecil Salisbury; an Application under Articles 2, 10, 19, 47 and 73 of the Constitution of Guyana
-
Bata Shoe Company Guyana Ltd v Commissioner of Inland Revenue; Attorney General Guyana Unit Trust Management Company Ltd et Al v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General
...for argument. (For the meaning of “to institute proceedings,” see Singh v. D'Oliveira, (1964) L.R.B.G. 163; Re Arthur & Hermanstyne, (1972) 19 W.I.R. 20, 55; and the two views of opposing counsel in Re Vernazza, [1960] 1 All E.R. 183, at p. 187.) 33 In my opinion, no right to a fair heari......
- Carlton Wilbert Weithers v Zena Weithers
-
Singh v Lall
...Guiana immediately before the 26th May, 1966.” [See Subsidiary Legislation for the year 1966, p. 244.] 66 In Re Arthur & Hermanstyne, (1972) 19 W.I.R. 20, at pp. 59–60, I endeavoured to show how the ancient prerogative writ of certiorari which has for centuries issued from the Queen's Benc......
Get Started for Free