Waveney Moses v Cecelia Kumar and Another

JurisdictionGuyana
CourtCourt of Appeal (Guyana)
Year1969
Date1969

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
16 cases
  • Emmanuel Fatima Adams Appellant v Randolph B. Russel & Felix Alexander Respondents [ECSC]
    • St Vincent
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Vincent)
    • 21 September 1972
    ...proffered." 9 Counsel also cited a passage in the judgment of Crane J.A. in the case of WaverleyMoses v. Cecilia Kumar and another (1969) 14 W.I.R. 328 at page 334. This passage reads: "Coming as late as that time, the appellant necessarily had to comply with 0. 2 r. 3 (4). This requires a ......
  • Melvin Arthur Joell Appellant v Edmund G. Maduro H. Lavity Stout Respondent
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Court of Appeal (British Virgin Islands)
    • 25 June 1990
    ... ... delay in transfer of funds to the Applicant from another country and he was unable to properly instruct his ... have been taken by the Court of Appeal of Guyana in Moses v Kumar 14 W.I.R. 328, where in accordance with the Rules ... ...
  • The British Virgin Islands Electricity Corporation Appellant v Shell Antilles and Guanas Ltd Respondent
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Court of Appeal (British Virgin Islands)
    • 25 June 1990
    ...Counsel cited EVELYN V. WILLIAMS (1962) 4WIR 265; RATNAM V. CUMARASAMY AND ANOTHER (1964) 3 ALL E. R. 933; MOSES V. KUMAR AND ANOTHER (1969) 14 WIR 328; PERSAUD AND OTHERS V. RAMSON (1979) 26 WIR 229; HARDIAL AND ANOTHER V. SOOKHIA (1980) 28 WIR 261; THOMPSON V. THOMPSON (1980) 33 WIR......
  • Mills v John
    • Grenada
    • Court of Appeal (Grenada)
    • 26 May 1983
    ...the exercise of the court's discretion in favour of an appellant depending on the facts of the particular case. 27 In Moses v. Kumar (1969) 14 W.I.R. 328 the Guyana Court of Appeal refused to accept the mistake of counsel as an exceptional circumstance, but held that even if it were; the ex......
  • Get Started for Free