Macadeen Ameerally and Aubrey Bentham v Attorney General DPP and Magistrate Prem Persaud
| Jurisdiction | Guyana |
| Judgment Date | 1978 |
| Year | 1978 |
| Date | 1978 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Guyana) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
42 cases
-
David Penn Claimant v [1] Telecommunications Regulatory Authority [2] Attorney General Defendant
...v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 at p 242 3 Operation Dismantle v The Queen (1985) 1 SCR 441 and Amerally and Bentham v Attorney General (1978) 25 WIR 272 4 2007 45 E.H.R.R 10 [2013] ECSC J0102-1 EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CLAIM NO. BVIHCV2012/355 Between: David ......
- An Application by Norris Williams and Cecil Salisbury; an Application under Articles 2, 10, 19, 47 and 73 of the Constitution of Guyana
- Frank Hope Competent Authority and Attorney General of Guyana v New Guyana Company Ltd and Vincent Teekah
- Ramson v Barker and Another
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
The evolution of constitutional protection of fundamental rights in Guyana
...Arts.3 and 10 of the 1970 Guyana Constitution correspond to arts.40 and 144 of the 1980 Guyana Constitution. 16 1970 Constitution. 17 (1978) 25 W.I.R. 272, 290. "if the constitution-makers intended art 3, like arts. 4 to 17 inclusive, to constitute guaranteedrights,it would be difficult to ......
-
Judicial Independence as an Indispensable Feature of the Rule of Law and Democracy: Implications for the Commonwealth Caribbean
...the extent to which the menacing executive inluenced litigation under the Bills is provided by the perverse outcome in Ameerally v AG (1978) 25 WIR 272 (CA Guy), where despite judicial acknowledgement that the particulars of the charge brought against the appellants disclosed no offence, th......